This
post RESUMES the topic
When a team shoots a high percentage from the floor, the number of second chance
opportunities will distinctly be smaller, but the efficiency of the second chance possession is not a function of
the number of second chance opportunities in a game.
Consequently, if teams have higher efficiency during second chances than first chances, a
team's game efficiency, taking all the different aspects into account, is nearly always
increased only because the offensive rebounding. By contrast, since that
relationship appears alternating, the important objective of collecting and evaluating data is in
the bonus possessions produced by the net offensive
rebounding differential.
A well balanced team would be more effective on second chance points than on first
chance points because, on most first chance possessions, the defense is accomplished and the offensive team must attack the set
defense to find their scoring opportunities. In whatever manner, with possessions
that go on with an offensive rebound, the defense is often lacking order at the instant of
the rebound, and these possessions often end with either a foul
[the most effective method of scoring] or a tap-in
or other relatively easy shot.
Only when the offensive team decides to withdraw the ball back out following an offensive
rebound and run its half court offense would the defense have an opportunity to reset
itself.
Concisely, to resume this post, teams obtain more easy scores in second chance possessions
than in first chance possessions, so they must be registered and analyzed as it was
explained and is included in the basketball Statistics Creative Analysis eBA System.
Jean Louis Trezeguet - ebastats
- the basketball statistics forum
This post
resumes this topic and will be completed at the "Statistics" chapter of the eBA basketball
Statistics Analysis System. Another basketball statistics topics
you'll
find at the basketball
Statistics Discussions section of our eBA
Stats.com site.