This post RESUMES the topic
About the Concept: As you can read at our Possessions Analysis:
Definition of Possession: the time your team gets the ball, all the way up until the
other team gets it back. At least for the purpose of this number, offensive rebounds
dont add possessions. This is comprehensible, since to determine
the cost of a turnover, for instance, we want to know what the total chance there was
that youd score some points before the other team got the ball back. That includes
getting offensive rebounds, since the turnover eliminates the possibility of getting
second chance points just as it did first chance points.
About the Formula: The total
number of possessions a team has can be calculated as
Field Goals Made + Opp Def. Rebounds + Turnovers + Up to the Line for 2/3-points)
Meanwhile another formulas use the coefficient "FTA / 2" or "FTA*0.4",
etc., the eBA System
uses the exact number of possession ended "up to the line" for 2 or 3 throws.
Discussion: This formula, with the "up to the line" coefficient, was
basically created because we felt it was a better evaluation of offensive and
defensive efficiency than to count stats like total rebounds, or total points scored
or allowed or divide the free throws attempts by estimates number of "2" or
multiply by "0.4".
About the rebounds formulas, you hear talk about "win the rebound war, win the
game" what is in general true, but not always. The addition of the 3 point shot
to the game of Basketball causes to re-estimate the value the formula as well. If in
short a team has the opportunity to score at least 3 points on every possession, instead
of two, so we have added an additional variable into the equation.
An additional way of thoughts is that by using FGA as a loss of possession, a possession is
lost every time a ball is shot. As a result a new possession starts with an
offensive rebound. This works against a good offensive rebounding team because it
punishes their Points / Possession evaluation.
To resume this question, as said above, from the moment there is discrepancy between
the number of free throws attempted per game so that the FTA/2 or FTA*0.4 is not always an
evaluation according to the rules, since on any given night the number of 1, 2, or 3 free
throw attempts for each fouled possession will vary. The eBA System uses the
exact number of possession ended "up to the line" for 2 or 3 throws as a better
measure regardless of the total number of attempts.
Commentary: Consequently many coaches are now using what is called
Points/Possession, or Turnovers/Possession. The Pts/Poss. is an impartial reliable
stat when all things are considered.
However it doesn't take into account the optimal pace as which a team plays.
Team A that receives 90 points may actually produce a better defensive efficiency
than team B that allowed 80 points: in a fast paced game, Team A received 90 points
but in 90 possessions. This means their defensive efficiency was 1.0. Team B
on the other hand received only 80 points but in a much slower paced game in 60 total
possessions. That is a defensive efficiency of 1.3 actually worse than team A who
allowed ninety points.
Points per possession is a completely good stat but what is more
important is to break it down into ranges such as an offensive or defensive efficiency
when you score or allow 90-100 points, 80-90, 70-80 and so forth. The parameter we
will find is that the team have better offensive and defensive efficiency ratings when he
plays at its team's optimal pace. The eBA System do this
break down in his "Quarters Reports", when the game is
analyzed every 5 minutes
by separate.
This summary
resumes this topic and will be completed at the "Statistics" chapter of the eBA Basketball
Statistics Analysis System. Another Basketball statistics topics
you'll
find at the Basketball
Statistics Discussions section of our eBA
Stats.com site.
Brian Denver - eBA Stats Team - The Basketball Statistics
Analysis
RELATED POSTS in this Forum:
Possession
Scoring Record System: Define - 31/08/05
RELATED ARTICLES in eBA-Stats.com:
Possessions Analysis